|
Sensitivity of the Analyses Overview | Research | Educational Activities | Services | Facilities | Faculty | Employment | News | CGT Home
|
|
Considerations used in determining the sensitivity of our analysis:
Ganguly A, Rock M & Prockop DJ (1993) Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of single-base differences in double-stranded PCR products and DNA fragments: Evidence for solvent-induced bends in DNA heteroduplexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10325-10329. Ganguly A & Prockop DJ (1995) Detection of mismatched bases in double stranded DNA by gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 16:1830-1835. These reports describe the CSGE method in detection of 68 polymorphisms or mutations in various genes. Based on the results, authors suggested that CSGE can detect almost all changes if the primers are designed in a manner that leaves >50bp "buffer sequence" in both 5' and 3' ends of the fragment. Also, isolated GC-rich regions were noted to be difficult areas for the detection of single-base pair sequence variations. According to these articles the sensitivity of the CSGE in detecting single base-pair mutations was either 95% (with the 50bp end-sequence effect considered i.e. five sequence variations less than 50bp from the end of the sequence were excluded) or 88% (all changes).
This article describes experiences and findings gathered by us during the two-year process of testing if CSGE could be used for scanning PCR products prior to nucleotide sequencing without sacrificing the sensitivity of mutation detection. By utilizing known sequence variations and their detection by CSGE we suggested new conditions for CSGE analysis. By employing these conditions we were able to detect virtually all 76 sequence variations tested. Importantly, these changes included the three changes in high melting regions that were not detected in previous articles. Therefore, we suggest that CSGE can detect virtually all single base-pair changes (~99%).
Large deletions and insertions may go undetected as well as homozygous mutations. Combined, these mutation types account for 2-3% of reported mutations in genes for type I and II collagens.
Additional factors
that possibly could decrease the sensitivity: However, these factors
are mostly hypothetical and therefore, it is very difficult to estimate
their effect, if there is any, to the sensitivity.
In
summary, we feel confident to say that
|
|