MODIFIED
RECTUS FASCIAL SUBURETHRAL SLING
INTRODUCTION:
Suburethral sling procedures have been used to treat urinary
incontinence secondary to nonfunctional internal sphincter
since the turn of the century. Slings can be formed from organic
material like round ligament, rectus fascia, and fascia lata.
The major problems encountered with the organic materials
are mainly due to insufficient length and inconsistent tensile
strength.
Urinary retention and refractory bladder instability are the
main complications. Inorganic materials, like Marlex, have
been used. In addition to retention and bladder instability,
foreign body reaction, draining sinus, infection, and erosion
are reported with inorganic slings.
Suburethral sling procedures have traditionally been reserved
for the treatment of recurrent stress incontinence (SUI),
especially in those women with immobile urethra. Recently,
there is a more expanding role of sling procedures in SUI
secondary to weak support of the vesicourethral segment, specially
in obese women and those with weak and unsatisfactory pelvic
fascial and ligaments. The modification described herein avoids
most of those problems and simplifies the procedure as well
as corrects mild cystocele.
SURGICAL
TECHNIQUE:
The surgeon's operative skill, familiarity with the procedure,
and personal preference will determine what material to use
and how to use it. Rectus fascia, fascia lata and lyophilized
dura are the most popular organic sling materials, while Marlex
and, more recently, Gore-tex, are the most commonly use for
an inorganic sling.
Since 1987, we have used the modified pubovaginal sling (MPVS)
in >170 patients with complicated stress urinary incontinence.
A modification of McGuire's free rectus fascia sling was used
in all patients.
1.) Preparation of the patient for a sling operation is similar
to that for any other genitourinary operation: a detailed
history, physical examination, voiding diary, routine preoperative
blood and urine analysis, radiological and urodynamic evaluations.
The presence of any other abnormality, such as detrusor instability,
stones, tumors, fistulae, diverticula, or any manifestation
of pelvic floor relaxation should be recognized and included
in the final planning before surgery. For example, concomitant
partial bladder denervation could be done in conjunction with
an anti-incontinence procedure for incontinent patients with
severe pre-operative detrusor instability.
2.) The patient is placed in a full lithotomy position. Prior
to induction of anesthesia, a sequentional compression device
is fitted to the lower limbs. This is specially important
in obese females to prevent pulmonary emboli. Abdominal and
vaginal preparation and draping are performed in a standardized
fashion. Stay sutures are used to retract labia and a weighted
vaginal retractor is placed. A urethral catheter is placed,
and 15 cc of water are used to inflate the balloon for better
identification of the bladder neck.
3.) Through a Pfannenstiel suprapubic incision, an anterior
rectus fascial flap measuring 7x2.5 cm is harvested and placed
in an antibiotic solution (Fig. 1). The fascia is defatted
and number 1 polypropylene suture is placed in a helical manner
on each end. To ensure strong attachment of the suture to
the sling, each edge is rolled and the suture is then anchored
to it. Tying the suture at each end should not strangulate
the fascia. The retropubic space is developed carefully and
previous suspension should be taken down. Cystourethrolysis
is performed so as to feel the back of the symphysis pubis,
the balloon of the Foley's catheter and the paravaginal fascia
without difficulty. This is an important step to free the
vesicourethral segment from adhesions that would prevent the
bladder neck from coating during stress. Also, the tip of
the suture carrier needle can be guided to the paravaginal
space safely without transfixing the bladder wall.
4.) Vaginal dissection is facilitated by saline infiltration.
Through an inverted "U" anterior vaginal incision centered
around bladder neck, the vesico-urethral unit is exposed and
dissection is carried laterally to the endopelvic fascia.
The endopelvic fascia is detached from its attachment to arcus
tendinous under the pubic bone just enough to admit a finger
into the retropubic space. A Stamey or Raz suture carrier
needle is passed through suprapubic incision on each side
and guided into the vaginal space. The polypropylene suture
is threaded into the eye of the needle and then brought to
the suprapubic area (Fig. 2). The sling is then centered behind
the posterior urethra and bladder neck. On each side, the
sling is fixed proximally into the pubo-cervical fascia and
distally into the pubo- urethral ligaments using polyglactin
sutures (Fig. 3) Cystoscopy is performed to rule out bladder
perforation by the sutures. Closure of the anterior vaginal
wall is performed using chromic catgut suture in a continuous
interlocking manner. The rectus fascia is closed by a continuous
PDS suture. The free ends of the polypropylene suture are
passed through a small teflon pledget and tied individually
over the rectus fascia and then tied together loosely, admitting
an index finger, in the suprapubic area. The suprapubic incision
is then closed in a regular fashion. A vaginal pack soaked
with antibiotic cream, is placed and left for one day. The
patient is discharged on the first or second postoperative
day. One week postoperatively, the patient is seen in the
clinic and a voiding trial is performed. Residual urine determination
is performed and, if significant, clean intermittent catheterization
program is started. Suprapubic catheter is used in patients
who cannot perform self-catheterization as demonstrated preoperatively.
Limited activity is gradually increased to full activity within
6 weeks. The patient is instructed to avoid strenuous activity
and sexual intercourse for 6 weeks.
CONCLUSION:
Sixty-eight (85%) of the patients were cured of their incontinence.
Additionally, eight patients (10%) were significantly improved
(using one or less pad per day). The overall success rate
is 95% with no significant difference between patients who
underwent MPVS as a single procedure or who had concomitant
reconstructive pelvic surgery. The group who underwent concomitant
reconstructive surgery showed a higher incidence of blood
loss, bladder and bowel laceration, upper respiratory tract
infection, wound infection, vaginal bleeding, and pelvic prolapse
(12 out of 14).
It is concluded that MVPS is effective in treating SUI secondary
to ISD with or without concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery.
However, female patients who required reconstructive pelvic
surgery had a higher risk of complications which can be explain
on the basis of weak pelvic tissue and prolonged operative
time.