The Degree Program in Structural & Cellular Biology |
The Department of Structural and Cellular Biology (SCB) offers programs of graduate study leading to the Ph.D. and under special circumstances, to the M.S. degree. This Ph.D. program at Tulane University is intended to train outstanding research scientists with a broad background in anatomy who are qualified to embark on careers as investigators and teachers. The student entering the Ph.D. program in SCB may choose from among three tracks depending upon the areas of interest for both research and teaching. These tracks are [1] gross anatomy [2] histology/cell biology and [3] neuroanatomy. Research apprenticeship with several faculty members is important. Students are introduced to a variety of research approaches in their first year by a series of rotations through faculty laboratories of the student’s choosing. Students are to identify a research laboratory and form a research committee early in their second year. At the end of the second year, students take a qualifying examination consisting of two parts: (1) an NIH-style research proposal prepared by the student in an area chosen by the student and their research committee and (2) an oral examination (defense) of the written research proposal. Upon successful completion of the qualifying exam and subsequent approval of the research prospectus the student is admitted to candidacy for the Ph.D. degree. Upon completion of a written dissertation the student presents a defense in the form of an open seminar and a closed discussion with the research committee and faculty follows. These Graduate Student Guidelines are intended to assist students in following the regulations of the Graduate School and the Department of SCB as they pursue their degrees. It is the responsibility of each student to meet the requirements and the deadlines established by the Graduate School. These can be found in the Tulane University Graduate School Bulletin. It is the hope of the SCB faculty that this training program will challenge each student to attain their full potential as a biomedical scientist and educator. |
For easy access to the following information, click the outline links below to be directed to that section of the guidelines. |
| I. Degree Programs |
| II. Curriculum |
| IV. Advancement to Candidacy |
| V. Graduate Advisors and Committees |
| VI. Residency |
| VII. Final Statement |
|
The qualifying exam shall consist of two sections, written and oral. The student should choose a research topic which is different from any research topic proposed in grant applications of the student’s research advisor. The topic must be approved by the Examination Committee. This is best achieved by presenting several topics in a meeting with the Examination Committee. The student will write an NIH- style grant application on the chosen topic, following guidelines for the Abstract and Research Plan sections of form PHS398. The Research Plan should include subsections: A. Specific Aims, B. Background and Significance, C. Preliminary Data (if any), D. Experimental Design and Methods, F. Animal Use (if any), and I. Literature Cited. This application will be submitted to the examination committee at least two weeks prior to the oral exam. The oral portion of the exam should be conducted approximately 6 weeks from the time of the topic approval by the examination committee. The student will present a 30- minute synopsis of the research proposal. This will be followed by questions from the Examination Committee and any other faculty present. The questions will be focused on, but are not limited to, the research proposal. The oral exam is not intended to be a review of coursework. The committee will be composed of thestudent’s research advisor and the student’s research committee. In the even that a student does not pass, the Examination Committee will have the option to recommend dismissal from the program, remedial work, or retesting at a later date. If the student is to be retested, the retest should take place no later than 3 months from the previous examination. |
|
Each student must prepare an outline of the research they intend to do for their dissertation; viz., a “Prospectus” of the research project. The Prospectus must be circulated to the student’s Research Committee a minimum of two weeks prior to the date of the “Prospectus Review,” and a copy should be placed in the departmental office for review by interested faculty members. The Research Committee must approve at least the three-page Prospectus that is required by the Graduate School. The Prospectus Review will be administered by the student’s Research Committee and will consist of a short presentation followed by discussion of the proposed research project as outlined in the Prospectus. Discussion will focus primarily on the relevant literature, research techniques, feasibility and significance of the research project. The Prospectus Review is not strictly an examination, but rather is an attempt to agree upon a research project. For approval of the Prospectus, the student must receive no more than one dissenting vote from the Research Committee. If the Prospectus is not approved, the Research Committee will recommend to the student an appropriate course of action. The Prospectus Review should occur by 1 July of the student’s third academic year. The Prospectus should be approved at least one year in advance of the dissertation defense. After completion of course requirements, Qualifying Examination, and approval of the Prospectus, students are recommended to the Graduate School for admission to candidacy, according to the regulations further detailed in the Graduate School Bulletin. After approval of the Prospectus, students will proceed, under the supervision of their faculty research advisors, to carry out the research as outlined in the Prospectus. If, during the course of the research, the student finds that it is necessary to deviate from the approved research plan, the faculty research advisor(s) must call a meeting of the student’s research committee to discuss and approve the desired changes. A written report of the research committee’s decision must be entered in the student’s departmental file. During the dissertation research or writing, the student is encouraged to approach any member of the research committee or others for advice, and in the event of a major problem, may, with the approval of the advisor(s), call a meeting of the committee to discuss the problem. During the course of the dissertation research, the student will meet with the research committee at least once every six months and present a progress report. At this time, the committee members can evaluate the research and may offer constructive advice. After completion of dissertation research, and before or during the early part of the dissertation preparation, the student will present their findings to the SCB faculty and other graduate students at departmental seminars. All students will prepare a dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. The student’s Faculty Research Advisor(s) will monitor the writing of the dissertation and advise the student. When the dissertation is submitted to the Research Committee, the organization, content, wording, grammar, and bibliography should be in essentially completed form. Copies of the dissertation must be in circulated to the committee members at least two weeks prior to the date of the Final Examination to allow the committee members to become familiar with the dissertation prior to the Examination and to correct any errors overlooked by the student and advisor(s). A copy of the dissertation should also be made available in the departmental office for evaluation by the rest of the departmental faculty, who may submit comments to the Research Committee. After successful completion of the Final Exam (Dissertation Defense), appropriate changes, as recommended by the research committee, will be made in the dissertation and a final copy prepared as specified in the Graduate School Bulletin. University regulations regarding dissertation format are available from the Graduate School; however, presentation of data should conform to acceptable scientific standards. A bound copy of the finished dissertation must be filed with the Department. Other copies must be provided as specified in the Graduate School Bulletin. This exam will be conducted by the student’s Research Committee and is a defense of the dissertation. The candidate will be expected to demonstrate sufficient knowledge of their research area and related topics during the defense of the dissertation. To pass this examination, a student must receive no more than one dissenting vote from the examining committee. The defense of the dissertation should not be considered less that one year following the prospectus defense. |
|
Each student must complete their degree program within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed seven years. A year of residence is defined as 11 months of full-time study/research activity. Each year a student is entitled to a maximum 4 weeks of vacation. Students are required to file “Leave Forms” with the SCB Office prior to leaving for vacation or scientific meetings. The minimal residency requirement for students with other graduate or specialized training will be determined by SCB with approval by the Dean of the Graduate School. |
|
Any exceptions to the regulations set forth in these Guidelines must be submitted in writing for consideration and approval by the SCB faculty. Also, any amendments or revisions to the guidelines must be approved by a majority of the SCB faculty. |
| SCB Home |